The crux of the philosophy as I promised. The article is misleading in a certain sense since it implies that the nature of God leads from the complex construction and deduction of the higher Universe perceived by the mind. I argue that this view could not be further from the truth, in the discourse I argue that the notion of God is the first notion that one is acquainted with, in fact our very being relies on this intrinsic belief. My reason for stating so follows from a metaphysical, epistemological, moral and aesthetic argument. Fundamentally each is one and the same, in perceiving god as the absolute oneness known as singularity.
Metaphysical
Ontology has historically stated that existence is necessitated by itself. Ontology is the capacity to ascertain the nature of being of a particular substance, to say that it exists is to say that one has knowledge of the singularity.
The Fundamental Ontology states that one can conceive of singularity itself. To prove this we begin with the infinite species as form, an infinity - mathematical or otherwise (such as ideas of physical forms) innately contains the aspect of generalisation. This innate characteristic is inherent to ontology for it embodies the 'in itself' archetype. The infinite species are given as a concrete illustration of totality, but in general abstract totality itself can be utilised for this proof. We can use the generalisation upon the form to attain the idea of the singularity itself.
We can now identify God as the first and highest singularity, the absolute infinite. The idea of God exists as a seed planted deep within the soul, breathed into man by the Lord and flowering as his existence. The singularity construction is a merely a perception of the innate idea of God which is boundless, incomprehensible and ineffable. The fundamental ontology allows the words written to gravitate meaning, the argument relies upon the reader understanding reality as a projection of singularity rather than a generalisation of form.
Epistemological
We must prove that there is only one higher structure. Multiplicity is a manifestation of singularity, the union of forms is only seen from the view of singularity. Without the view we cannot relate the forms together. To say that there are multiple higher structures is to refer to multiplicity at a higher level. But the transcendental merges together in oneness. To make this more clear we speak of something which we cannot known, and then speak of another which is unknown. But these are one and the same as being linked by their common property.
The gem of my philosophy is singularity, the gift of the mind is conception. The one source which allows one to form higher structure must be structure higher than self. We now conclude that this is one, so we speak of highest structure.
God is the absolute, the transcendent and the source of conception. He is the highest structure in that he is above structure, name and form. He gifted the human mind with thought as a manner of awareness, a reflection of his absolutely infinite awareness. He is boundless and limitless - I cannot hope to communicate truth in mere words but I hope that this writing may be taken as inspiration for those to journey to truth themselves.
Moral
The premise of this argument is unique in that it addresses the subjective nature of human experience, but the learned understands that there is truly no difference between 'subjectivity' and 'objectivity' when all truth is simply absolute and one. The argument essentially relies upon an 'aesthetic' ideal of goodness and beauty that we have perception of in the world of forms. But these attributes are merely reflected into lower being by higher being, summarised by the next meta-theorem:
Reflection Principle - The attributes of the singularity present themselves in form.
Proof: As singularity is the infinite expansion of form, the fundamental attribute is continuously utilised to produce our singularity. In fact from some of the first discussions we concluded that the attribute of a substance is the essence of a substance itself. Clearly the singularity contains attributes of the form. Similarly form must contain attributes of the singularity to be individuated instances.
In the article 'On the Nature of Good and Evil' I defined goodness as an act or being which motivates one to a higher state of existence. Defining God as the greatest possible state of existence in turn defines him as the singularity of goodness. Alternatively we could define God as a singularity of beauty, but this is simply a restatement of the attributes of God all being one and the same, but reflecting themselves in different perceptions. The sum totality of such perception leads to the absolute perception of God. It follows that existence of beauty, perfection, goodness and all positive attributes exist by ordination of the high singularity, which is God.
This argument is not to say that God exists by generalisation of the beauty and love found in nature, but God is the source of beauty, love and all manners of goodness. The inversion of the fundamental paradigm of human thought as striving to the greater through the lesser is the paramount and quintessential objective of my philosophy, to end cycles of mindless suffering in the world of forms to achieve perfect neutrality in singularity.
A note on a 'Proof of God'
Oneness is the absolute truth, the absolute oneness ordains existence itself which is why it seems silly to speak of a 'proof' of God. God is independent of human recognition spited in the den of evil ignorance, his existence is analogous to that of the fundamental ontology, he is of himself.
I go as far to say that God cannot be proven, for any proof takes place in a human system of thought and logic. That which is proven is bound within such systems. How can one hope to prove that which lies not merely beyond the known and constructible systems but beyond the mind itself? I 'argue' for God as a discourse on my meditations and contemplations. Take from this as you will, I simply beckon lovers of knowledge to search for its source and truth.
