The heart of my philosophy rests upon the notion of Singularity. But understand, that this notion is merely a thought and idea. At the highest levels of metaphysical existence and true understanding is a need to transcend known manners of thought. To illustrate, one cannot become true self through 'thought', for 'thought' itself is a particular restriction upon the total sea of being. If one were to become soul there would be no thought at all but simply infinite cosmic awareness, understanding the cosmos as all internal and external reality which the self produces.
Out of this restriction is born the idea of the Will. The Will is a manifestation of ontology, the singularity expansion of the self indexed by the self. This is necessitated by the Fundamental Ontology; one can conceive of the notion of singularity itself and in this argument we refer to the ability to conceive of the singularity of the self (the fundamental ontology can be used to assert the existence of any singularity of that which can be known).
Observe that the proof of the Will is singularity constructed from singularity, precisely how it is defined. The conception upon this singularity produces the singularity again, I refer to this as an ontological circle. We come to a true ontology and tautology which is why I refer to this as the first truth which is the pathway to all insight of absolute truth. This allows us to break away from the material constraints of the word and the known, for the will is fundamentally unknown by the mind - for it is the mind.
Further to this my whole philosophy is a perception of truth, the act of communication and written knowledge produces a further level of perception, this study will not produce the highest state of existence for as we said - we must transcend simply 'knowing'. This transcendence is 'becoming' and is achieved through spiritual practice. In the end we do not know the soul, but we become the soul. We do not know the truth, but we become truth.
For singularity to be will it must have awareness of its own being. The human spirit is distinguished in this regard, from the objects of our knowing in that it holds the capacity to know, and know of its knowing. This infinite regression of knowing is the product of an infinite singularity of awareness, which is will. The existence of the form rests upon the singularity, and all thoughts rest upon the mind, and as such are sustained only by its being. In a similar fashion the being of the self is only sustained by the being of God.
The nature of God is as the Divine Will, he is to himself which necessitates and allows for all existence. All being is a reflection of his being. The fundamental nature of the divine will becomes more essential when we consider it as the singularity of will, and the source of ontology. Truly, the human will is form of the Divinity abstracted, as soul is form of the Divine Spirit, for what is will other than soul itself?
All existing singularities have will towards themselves. Even the singularity of the most trivial item your eyes lay upon in your field of vision. However there is no epistemological value in speaking of the 'Will' of these singularities for they lack the ability of conception. If one remains confused as to why it is necessary for all singularities to have Will then I shall clarify; the being which allows theoretical structure to have concrete mental reality opposed to arbitrary and potentially meaningless name is some ability to manifest itself. Singularity must manifest as form, otherwise there would be no singularity. In fact, this manifestation is a reflection of the fundamental ontology. Singularity exists only in the fact that it is the product of form. This is a self evident truth and I urge the reader to strive for simplicity of understanding lest he fall into sophistic intellectual word play with no true meaning.
This is one if your best articles; I especially liked your commentaryon the nature of God as the Divine Will. However, the highlight of this article is your assessment of making spiritual progress; one must strive to 'know', not 'know about'. This is a very important distinction.
ReplyDelete